Walker reminded us, not all Loyalists were white. Not only was there a Loyalist ideology that mirrored that of the patriots, 4 but Loyalists came from various social and ethnic backgrounds and had differing motivations for remaining loyal to the Crown and often conflicting expectations of the future when they were forced to flee from the new republic. Certainly, as will be evident below, interpretations offered 25 years ago continue to illuminate our understanding of what it meant to be a loyal subject of the Crown in 18th-century North America. We continue to be fascinated by the day-to-day struggles of the Loyalists during and after the American Revolution and to be intrigued by the scope of their beliefs.
However, is it moral when American patriots called those people are traitors while they betrayed the people who first discovered America, which is the British?
This essay will focus on connection between loyalist and traitor; the essay will first define the meaning of loyalist and traitor during American Revolutionary War and thereafter will compare a contrast with Joseph Brant and Benedict Arnold. The conclusion will focus on the argument between loyalist and traitor, and whether Joseph Brant or Benedict Arnold was a traitor.
In Junethe First Continental Congress declared that anyone who does such as provisioning the British army, saying anything that undermined patriot morale, and discouraging men from enlisting in the Continental army is a traitor Roark,p Not everyone agrees, however some people stayed loyal to the British crown, because they were conservative, most commonly, loyalists were wealthy, well educated conservative people who supported continued British authority in order to maintain domestic stability and their current standard of living.
Moreover, loyalists always consider themselves morally and better than the colonists. Others still stayed loyal to the Britain because they are native Indian, they wanted to get protection from the British.
As the Revolution began, many Indian tribes tried to stay neutral. However, as the war grew, they eventually chose sides, the Americans considered most of the native Indian sided with England are traitor.
A good example of that is the case of Joseph Brant. Additionally, Joseph is considered a monster by America patriots, due to the Wyoming Valley massacre of and Cherry Valley massacre; however, he did not participate in the battles.
Arnold was an American patriot, in he opposed the stamp Act. Furthermore, after joining the growing army outside Boston, he considered himself through acts of cunning and bravery.
Benedict Arnold was a brilliant military talent but he was so ambitious and greedy that willing to risk his life and the lives of others to get what he wanted. Following this further, in he opened secret negotiations with the British, he trading information for money, more than that Arnold plot to sell a West Point victory to the British.
However, his plot was exposed when the American captured British Major Andre was carrying papers that revealed the plot. In conclusion, the American patriots were regarded as great heroes during the War and loser, which is the loyalist, were called traitor.
Take this into personal opinion; I think determining who was a loyalist still depend on what condition. During the war, loyalist tried to avoid the war and wanted to be neutral but American patriots forced them to choose sides by threatening them.
The fact that American patriots fought for their liberty and freedom can not be argue but is it moral when they tried to win the War by threatening their own people. Whereas, Benedict Arnold is a real traitor, Arnold betrayed his people, his brothers and sister for the money and Arnold can be considered that the man without country, he has no country to fight for, the only thing he lived for is the money.
The truth that American patriots won the War cannot be changed, however, in the British point of view American might be the traitor. Choose Type of service.- The American Revolution was the poignant turn to the freedom of the American Colonies.
With America being able to defeat British, it gave their mother country the realization a new nation and broke the control they had over. American Revolution: Loyalist Believed Patriots, James Chalmers Plain Truth In the years prior to the American Revolution there were many different perspectives on whether the colonies should fight for their independence, or remain loyal to England and attempt to repair their relationship.
During the American Revolution, not only did men have to face the struggles of war time atmosphere, but women had to as well. The country during the war was divided into three different groups of people; the loyalists, the patriots and the remaining people who did not care.
While matters such as social class, race and gender were important during the American Revolution, these factors were just few of many others related to the broader theme of equality.
Religion Throughout the secondary accounts of various social issues during the revolution, other facets of society such as religion and political views were also . Later, during the American Revolution, most colonists took one side or the other.
Either they were Patriots or loyalist. Patriots believed that the colonies should break away from England and govern themselves.
Loyalist believed that the colonies should stay true, or loyal, to the king and to England. They were also known as Tories. A Biography of Gouverneur Morris Of French and English descent, Morris was born at Morrisania estate, in Westchester (present Bronx) County, NY, in